Intercomparing Surface Water Extent Mapping Products and Packages
Satellite Earth Observations (EO) have long proven to be a powerful tool for observing floods given their ability to cover large geographic areas where ground-based observations are lacking. There is a wealth of literature demonstrating various techniques for satellite-based surface water extent mapping for flood applications on both optical and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) sensors, but users struggle to apply different techniques and discern which are most appropriate for unique contexts. To mitigate these challenges, many organizations have recently created global analysis-ready water map products, while others create customizable software that users can tailor and apply to their region of interest. Given the range of surface water mapping products and software packages available, it is imperative for the scientific community to precisely communicate to end users the accuracies, uncertainties, and assumptions underpinning these products. Without such communication, end users seeking to apply EO for flood early action and risk reduction will be oversaturated with surface water mapping products and software that may yield conflicting results. SERVIR – a joint initiative of NASA, USAID, and geospatial organizations in Asia, Africa, and Latin America – co-develops regionally tailored services to inform specific decisions and early actions. To address a growing need across the SERVIR network to understand the performance of open-source satellite-based surface water extent data products and software for inland flood applications, SERVIR is conducting a flood mapping intercomparison project. This presentation introduces the project, presents preliminary results, and discusses the tradeoffs, strengths, and weaknesses of the sensor characteristics (e.g., spectral, temporal, and spatial resolution) and methodologies associated with each product/package. The desired outcome of this intercomparison is clarity to decision-makers and scientists alike regarding the strengths and weaknesses of many different surface water extent mapping products/software in several decision-making contexts. We anticipate the results from this study will improve the understanding surrounding the use of EO for flood early action and risk reduction.